Duncan
Campbell and George Lakoff
The Evolutionary Challenge of the 21st Century
for the Political Mind

Duncan
Campbell, visionary conversationalist and host of the
internationally
acclaimed Living Dialogues program and George
Lakoff, founder of the progressive think tank the Rockridge
Institute engage in a very timely and stimulating dialogue on
the evolutionary challenge of the 21st century.
The matters George and I dialogue about have
universal implications to any country and political system, even though
we are here focused on examples from the upcoming “tipping
(or toppling) point” 2008 election in the United
States. You will find it interesting no matter which country
you live in because the archetypal structure of the human brain, as we
know, is something we share across the globe and that really is the
point of these programs.
We are all called to go beyond the initial adolescent
“breaking away” from the oppressive rule of Mother
Church and Father Sovereign in the 18th Century European Enlightenment
through the celebration of “Reason”, which used the
printing press and widespread “democratized”
dissemination of knowledge as a path to empowering the
“middle class” and “the
people”. We need now to make a more subtle leap of consciousness in the 21st
Century. In our present latter stage adolescent polarization
we are stuck in rationalized secular and religious
“identity” ideologies and estranged from our early
heritage of empathy, with an over-emphasis on expressing our identity through
exclusivism and dominance rather than cooperation and co-creative
collaboration. Instead we are called to move into a nurturing, mature
politics based on self-confident, not self-assertive, transpartisan
dialogue.
[>]
Click here
to listen to Part 1 of the
Dialogue
In Part 2 of our
dialogue, George and I recap how our political choices are influenced
by the imprint of our early socialization in our families of origin,
and the subsequent acculturation we receive in our education (or lack
of it) and in our communities. As George describes it, our early
neurological imprints from our family lead us to think of political
parties as a “family” (an idea often reaffirmed by the
language of politicians themselves). The Republican Party in the
U.S. he sees as associated with the “strict father”
parent and the Democratic Party associated with the “nurturing
parents” archetype (belittled and caricatured by the
Republicans, abetted by a compliant and somewhat cowed media, as the
“Mommy” or “nanny” party, falsely represented
as supposedly taxing the “hard-working” middle class
and doling out monies and welfare to the undeserving poor.)
Because of these
neurological imprints – manipulated by negative and misleading
ads, including outright deliberate deception – many voters do
not vote their economic interests based on “the issues”
(as one would expect from a Maslow
hierarchy of external needs psychological model, based
on “kitchen table” issues of food, shelter, and jobs).
Instead, many voters are emotionally triggered and duped by
fabricated wedge distractions into voting based on fear, anxiety, and
compliance with authority – often against their own interests
and that of their children and grandchildren – in order to
reaffirm their ”identity” within a group.
The final section is
devoted to the dominant “narratives” that are at play
between Obama and McCain, what they represent in the collective
American psyche, and how they relate to the evolutionary challenge
and initiation beyond adolescent group mind we are all confronted
with. Will this election be a Tipping Point and a leap forward, or a
Toppling Point in a great fall backward.
[>]
Click here
to listen to Part 2 of the
Dialogue
In Part 3 of the dialogue -- recorded September 12, 2008 after the Democratic and Republican Party Conventions -- George and I update and expand considerably on the “narrative” themes of the campaign, why the Republicans say that the campaign is not about “issues” but about “personalities”, and how that approach derived from a corporate marketing strategy begun by Nixon and firmly established as Republican precedent by Reagan. Understanding the modes of manipulation of these “framings” – unconscious to the ordinary voter and not illuminated by the media – is a key to understanding the election as it proceeds, including the formal debates between the candidates. The collective psyche of the U.S., like that of the planet, is at a critical evolutionary turning point. As observed by C. G. Jung, if we bring the elements at work in the unconscious to awareness, as we do in participating in these kinds of dialogues, then we open the possibility of fulfilling our higher purpose and destiny, rather than enduring an unconscious fate.
[>]
Click here
to listen to Part 3 of the
Dialogue
“I’m George Lakoff, and
I’m here on Living Dialogues, having a great talk.
The talk we’ve been having is exactly the kind of dialogue
that we need in this country.”
– George Lakoff
[>>] Related Dialogues of Immediate
Interest:
++ Access theFull
Archive to Living Dialogues
|